Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Scientific theories and philosophical stances : themes from Van Fraassen / edited by Claus Beisbart and Michael Frauchiger

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: Germany De Gruyter 2024Description: 240pISBN:
  • 9783111019635
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 501.13 BEI-C
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Shelving location Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
Books Books BITS Pilani Hyderabad 500 General Stack (For lending) 501.13 BEI-C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) EUR 99.95 Available 49969
Total holds: 0

Since the publication of his seminal monograph "The scientific image", Bas van Fraassen is a key figure in philosophy of science. In this book, other philosophers with various outlooks critically discuss his work on theories, empiricism and philosophical stances.

The book starts with a new article by van Fraassen on his preferred account of theories, the so-called semantic view. This account is now 50 years old, and van Fraassen takes this anniversary as an opportunity to review the account, its history and the philosophical discussion about it.

In the main part of the book, Nancy Cartwright, Finnur Dellsén, Matthias Egg, Steven French, Michael Friedman, Milena Ivanova and Michela Massimi discuss van Fraassen's contributions to philosophy. Three chapters focus on his engagement with realism (French, Friedman, Ivanova). Others study his voluntarism (Cartwright) and his view on representation (Massimi). Finally, there are contributions about his elaboration of empiricism (Dellsén) and his proposal to consider philosophical positions as stances (Egg).

The volume includes a laudatio written by Steven French and finishes with a reply by van Fraassen to his critics.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.
An institution deemed to be a University Estd. Vide Sec.3 of the UGC
Act,1956 under notification # F.12-23/63.U-2 of Jun 18,1964

© 2024 BITS-Library, BITS-Hyderabad, India.